Is Aaron Sorkin neccessary?
Move over, Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn! Make room for that ultra-modern, snap-crackling, wise-cracking couple, Aaron Sorkin and Maureen Dowd.
Emmy-winning "West Wing" creator Sorkin seemed determined to answer the questioning title of Dowd’s new book, “Are Men Necessary?” in the negative Monday night. He turned the author Q&A into a stammering, obsequious cross-examination of the ravishing redhead at her only Los Angeles book signing for The Writers Bloc, held at Temple Emanuel in Beverly Hills.
Sorkin started off by apologizing: “I’m not a professional interviewer, but I have to think that my being able to question you in a synagogue full of people is a little nightmare for you.”
Then he focused on Dowd’s indisputable beauty. Rambling ad nauseum, he repeatedly asked her to address the fact that people talk more about her looks than William Safire’s, until she blushed and asked him to stop because “You’re embarrassing me.”
“The way you look is a factor in everything that people write about you,” Sorkin persisted. “It is, Maureen. You are the only female columnist at the New York Times. You are the only female columnist of note in the entire country, and I think that people expect you to look different and I’m just wondering if you want to talk about that?
“No,” clipped a sweetly smiling Dowd to the thunderous applause.
Next, Sorkin tried out an old joke. “You are the most respected, revered columnist in the country and you have a Pulitizer Prize and you dated me for a while. What was that like?”
"I asked you in the green room not to mention that," replied Dowd, smiling through gritted teeth. "It was fantastic, of course."
Photo: Presenter Maureen Dowd, ravishing in an emerald gown, at the Glamour Magazine 2005 Women of the Year Awards in New York.
(Larry Busacca / WireImage)
Dowd did try to take control of the ill-fated Q&A, talking about what Shakespeare could have done with the Darth Vadar of D.C., Dick Cheney.
She also told tales about the time she was nearly jailed for wearing a sheer burka in Saudi Arabia, about the growing popularity of Barbie, fake boobs, Botox and Playboy Bunnies. Dowd then threw in intriguing, insightful remarks about the downslide of feminine consciousness where, she says, women have gone from fighting for equal rights in the '60s to trying to find their “inner slut” today.
She praised Sorkin’s strong, well-written female characters on “West Wing” before asking, "Why, when women are running four of the six major studios, is Hollywood is still making moves portraying women as maids, shopgirls, hookers, ghosts and geishas?"
“Don’t encourage her,” Sorkin warned the wildly applauding audience, before patiently explaining, “Hollywood is about what is successful. The films that appeal to most women are films like 'Bridget Jones’ Diary.' Women like seeing films about how hard it is to get a date, then eating ice cream after a bad date and ultimately having a good date. It’s women who make these films successful.”
Sorkin admitted he often thought of Dowd while writing witty banter for actresses. And he did tell a funny, if slightly embarrassing, shoe fetish tale about Dowd, whom he met during the first season of "The West Wing" when he was shooting scenes in Washington, D.C.
“I wrote an off-screen character who was a powerful, highly feared female columnist for the New York Times. One of the White House staffers had inadvertently made a joke about her shoes and was afraid that the administration was going to suffer if he didn’t apologize.”
To thank Dowd for being “a good sport” about the thinly veiled reference, Sorkin sent her a slew of expensive shoes from Barneys the day the show aired.
“She liked them a lot,” recalled Sorkin. “But she told me that because she sometimes covers Hollywood in her column, to accept the gift was unethical. But she didn’t give back the shoes. What she has done, and this was five or six years ago, is, every once in a while, she will just give me cash. Forty, sixty, one hundred dollars … It’s not clear to me how giving me cash makes the ethical picture less murky, but it was terribly important to Maureen that this be done right and this is her version. She just gives me cash.”
“It’s gonna take me to the year 2030 to pay off those shoes,” confessed Dowd, still smiling, albeit not quite as sweetly.

i agree with naddyfive about Anne Coulter's appearance. And I agree with Banjo on his numbers too. Coulter is AT LEAST 49.9 times better looking, anorexica, implants and all. Smarter too.
Posted by: ShortBiggie | November 28, 2005 at 11:55 PM
Anne Coulter looks like a deranged anorexic trannie who needs to get her implants deflated by about a cup size.
Posted by: naddyfive | November 28, 2005 at 11:30 AM
Coulter is approximately 50 times funnier than Dowd. (The real number is 49.8). Better looking, too.
Posted by: Banjo | November 27, 2005 at 02:52 PM
Did someone mention depth and Maureen Dowd in the same post???
Posted by: grandcosmo | November 27, 2005 at 01:07 AM
Correction: Real redheads are one in 40. Those of us who don't look like Howdy Doody as a girl are in shorter supply.
Posted by: Amy Alkon, The Advice Goddess | November 26, 2005 at 12:11 PM
I wonder why that relationship petered out?
Posted by: Menlo Bob | November 26, 2005 at 09:56 AM
"Depth." "Humor." Huh.
Posted by: Jim Treacher | November 26, 2005 at 07:27 AM
All this Maureen Dowd "ravishing redhead" stuff is nonsense. "Ravishing redheads" are a dime a dozen in America. With a little dye, a nice facelift, and some good eyeshadow, perhaps a sex-change operation-- we all can be "ravishing redheads." What makes Maureen Dowd interesting is that she's such a humourously, mean-spirited, slashing attack-dog of a columist. Dowd would be the liberal version of Ann Coulter if her columns did not have a lot more depth and a lot less cliche than Coulter. At the constant risk of dehumanizing herself, Dowd brings out the embarrassing, monstrous truth of the Bush White House. I'd say God Bless Her if I weren't an atheist. God bless her anyway.
Posted by: riccaric | November 25, 2005 at 07:25 PM
As Jonathan Winters said once: "The only thing that scares me is a man or woman without a sense of humor" (and that's no joke)
Posted by: ned | November 25, 2005 at 10:06 AM
Socrates would have been a lot better than Sorkin. And the entrance fee would've been better spent on hemlock. A plague on both their shows/columns.
Posted by: An Attendee | November 24, 2005 at 03:23 PM
Thanks, Socrates.
Posted by: Amy Alkon, The Advice Goddess | November 24, 2005 at 02:26 PM
Hollywood makes piles and piles of tripe and piles and piles of money. As long as those two facts co-exist, how can anyone expect them to make anything else? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!!!"
If you don't like the situation as it presently exists (and many people apparently do like it), don't go to the movies.
Posted by: Advocatus Diaboli | November 24, 2005 at 08:28 AM
And I paid $20 to observe this blathering and pandering spectacle?
Posted by: An Attendee | November 24, 2005 at 05:48 AM
"Why, when women are running four of the six major studios, is Hollywood is still making moves portraying women as maids, shopgirls, hookers, ghosts and geishas?”
It's basic evolutionary psychology. Perhaps Dowd didn't actually read the Stephanie Brown study about how men tend prefer subordinate women that she mentioned in her confused diatribe/book excerpt in the NYTimes.
It's also basic drama. The character has to go somewhere. Lady vice-president does what, apply for a transfer to the San Francisco office?
The biggest problem is not what jobs women hold in movies, but the fact that Hollywood makes piles and piles of tripe. Whether the woman in a particular piece of tripe is a manicurist, an executive, or an assassin is immaterial. Dowd makes the (sexist) mistake of expecting female studio heads to be responsible to women, not their stockholders. It's just as sexist as people who lament the absence of a woman president or supreme court justice. Thanks, but I'll settle for the best person for the job, man, woman, or hermaphrodite.
And PS, they should've gotten David Rensin to interview her.
Posted by: Amy Alkon, The Advice Goddess | November 24, 2005 at 03:06 AM